The same thing happened with the PS2 at the beginning of its life span. It was harder to develop for unlike the dreamcast which had the best launch library in history IMO. Dreamcast I think also better AA in its games just like the 360. Difference is M$ can throw money at developers like Am2 to force them to go online when they said that they never would. I'm not going to sell my PS3 because you never know what can happen when developers start to take full use of the hardware. I'm just waiting for a PS3 patch.

problem is tribal is that a patch for the PS3 is only rumor for now. i wouldnt be suprised if the PS3 version didnt get a patch. think about it how many PS3 games have gotten a patch so far?

then think about all the 360 games that have gotten updates. i hope it happens but like i said i wont be suprised if it doesnt. i myself dont care to much for online play but having an obsolete version of VF5 does bother me.

Aoimaster the problem is how long do we have to wait till the PS3 has a decent library of games? with the 360 you dont have to wait it already has a decent library. your comparing the PS2 with the PS3.

this is microsofts second game console their not the new kid on the block anymore. sony already had a following because of there ps1. the PS3 is a diffrent story. microsoft took a page out of sonys book and released there console first.

sony thought they were so successful pushing dvd players that now they think they can do it with blue ray. in my opinion sony is just trying to sell blue ray players while microsoft is selling a gaming console.

thats the difference in my opinion. sony has gotten such a big head. yea they were successful with the PS2 and its dvd player but that doesnt mean you can sell an expensive blue ray player just cause your sony.

the other thing is this. i paid 300 for my PS2 and 600 for my PS3. most people when they spend 600 on a gaming console expect more than what theyve got so far from sony. us PS3 owners deserve better from sony.

it doesn't mean that vf5 can't have one.

Aoimaster the problem is how long do we have to wait till the PS3 has a decent library of games? with the 360 you dont have to wait it already has a decent library. your comparing the PS2 with the PS3.

the problem you have is that you're comparing a couple month old ps3 to a 360 that's be out for longer than a year. of course it's going to have a larger library, it's been out for much longer. when 360 first came out it didn't have a huge lists of games pouring out for it. not to mention, you also had quite a few games that were still coming out for original xbox, which is essentially the same thing ps2 and ps3 are doing right now.

IM THERE!!!

Its playstation space for me..

First we have the game right now. We're playing it right now.
Although the Xbox version will have kewl stuff in it., That's future tense. Xbox 360 players are not playing the game right now.
For all we know the delivery date will be delayed again. Sega has a credibility problem right now anyway.

How many times has the release date for the Xbox 360 been moved back?

So while the Xbox crowd are waiting we're playing today. By the time the Xbox version comes out, the next PS3 release won't be far behind. So we're still ahead of the game.

that's a sacrifice most poor people like me are willing to take mr.poo sure, you get to play vf5 early (while I freeload from you..) but then at the end of the day i would feel like 420gamer, desperately trying to sell his ps3 and trying to get MORE money for anoher console + game + stick. I'll say good choice for those poor people like us that waited.

its pretty pathetic seeing people jump ship.

if you only bought the PS3 for VF5, that was unwise.

VF5 is not the final version of VF this generation.
I am sure we will see most of the features in the next version for PS3.

Some people give up so easily.

VF4: Final Tuned didn't make it to the PS2. I'm not convinced that VF5: Evo or whatever will make it to the PS3. We've seen both MS and Sony shell out tons of money to 3rd party studios for exclusive content, or for outright game exclusivity for a console. If VF5 really takes off online for the 360, maybe Evo only makes its way to the 360.

Lastly, the differences between the PS3 VF5 and 360 VF5 are massive. I'm not sure even if VF5 gets a re-release or update for the PS3 it will be a mirror version of the 360s. Basically it looks like the X-Box360 is the superior platform for this generation of VF games.

exactly EmpNovA. Djtortilla every game has been superior on the 360 not just VF5. if a game is made for PS3 or 360 im definently getting the 360 version. jump ship, everytime i hear about the PS3 its bad news.

like for example sony losing another exclusive. how many times has that happen now? not only that but the 360 versions of games are also improved over the PS3. everyone is saying the PS3 just came out people give it some time.

well look at the upcoming release of PS3 games. how long did it take for the 360 to get a decent library of games? not long. how long will it take for the PS3? ive had my PS3 since november and i have to say there isnt shit to play.

like i said the only games i play are VF5 and resistance. the rest of the PS3 games arent worth my time. that or there made better on the 360. so you tell me how long will it take for sony to at least have a decent library.

some of you sony fans are way to optimistic. hey at least i can admit i made a mistake buying the PS3. it didnt take the 360 this long to have a good library of games. so dont give me the whole PS3 just came out nonsense.

im also selling my PS3 because i know games released in the future will be better on 360. for example im purchasing unreal tournament 3 and im pretty sure itll be better on the 360.

i wouldnt mind if i paid 300 or even 400 on the PS3 but no i spent 600 dollars on a blue ray player. everyones saying look at the PS2. yea well the PS2 cost alot less too. this is different the difference in number of quality games is substantial.

the reason the PS2 was better than the xbox imo was that it had a better library. this time the 360 has the better library and the superior versions of the same games.

so ive looked up the upcoming release of some of big PS3 games and it looks like its going to be a long time till the PS3 has a library of good games. after lair what other big PS3 game is going to be released next?

yea yea yea i know 360 do break down but at least microsoft will fix your 360 after a year is up. what will sony do for you when your PS3 breaks down after 1 year. theyll make you buy a new PS3 thats what theyll do.

remember how long it took for PS2 to get disc error read. it took a couple of years. so who knows what happens when your PS3 breaks down in a year or two? your going to be left with a broke PS3. then your screwed.

sony wont repair your PS3 after a year. the last thing some of you are saying wait for the PS3 in two or three years itll make its mark. why do i have to wait 2 to 3 years if i spent 600 on a gaming console.

i have to wait for developers to tap into the PS3's full potential. sony shouldve made it easier for game developers to make games for the PS3 easier right off the bat.

now sony decides to make tools so its easier for developers to make games. shouldve been done along time ago sony. sony is just riding on there popularity of the PS1 and PS2. theyve gotten big heads.

they think well just make another playstation console and itll sell. im also hearing microsoft is paying other game companies to make the games better on 360. yea well its not like sonys poor.

what you dont understand about sony is that its the microsoft of japan. sonys a huge company that made there own console just to take nintendos share of the gaming market. so now microsoft is doing just what sony did.

so sony does have money to throw at game developers. their just stingy. sorry sony but japanese gamers dont reflect the rest of the world.

just cause your a japanese game company and your country is supporting your console doesnt mean the rest of the world should. i know 360 is failing in japan but the wii is still out selling the PS3 in japan.

in the end it seems like the PS3 is catering to its japanese fanbase way too much. what about the rest of the world sony have you forgot about us?

PS3 might be bigger than 360 in japan but in my opinion microsoft at least cares about its consumers worldwide. sony has the mindset of if its good enough for the japanese consumer then its good enough for the rest of the world.

for example yea arcades work in japan but not so much outside of japan. with the PS3 i feel like i own a console made for gamers in japan. the PS3 was made with japanese consumers in mind and you can really tell.

sony doesnt care about its fanbase outside of japan. well at least with it seems that way with the PS3. if it works for japanese consumers then itll work for any consumer. thats sonys mindset for the PS3.

just cause it works for japanese gamers in japan doesnt mean its going to work for the rest of us. stop trying to cater to just your japanese fanbase sony thats all i ask.

yea japanese gamers in japan might buy the PS3 cause its made by a japanese company. their going to support the PS3 just because its made by sony a japanese company.

that doesnt mean the rest of the world should support sony. especially when they only cater to there japanese fanbase. like i said whatever sonys japanese fanbase wants out of its console is what we the rest of the world has to settle for.

what sony doesnt get is that we as consumers shouldnt have to settle for whats good for them is good for us mentality. just because the PS3 might work well for consumers in japan doesnt mean itll work for the rest of the world.

sorry everyone for the long post and lack of punctuation.

+230902342342