Boy, have time passed. Hopefully I will be less busy in the coming weeks to put some additional stuff/tidbits onto the website.

Thank you very much Akai! This info is very useful for understanding the whole system of each char and his potencial.
To understand how one should do a reversal, fuzzy guard and etc.
p.s Great and useful project indeed=)))
_____________________________________________

Wanna play on the next level etc. Kage 4ever=)

I need some opinion on viewing images on this website.

Below are images taken at different parameters. I would like to know what image size (50% or 25%) and quality (high/medium/low) do you prefer to view or have on the website. Also take into consideration of download time of images (smaller image size/lower quality = faster loading).

At the moment, for the forum pages, the "4 frame image" at 50% is too large. For the wiki, it fits (at least on a widescreen monitor). There appears to be very little differences between high/medium/low image quality. Seems only noticeable when there is a strong area of contrast (black Dural getting hit with the jab).

Any suggestions on a different format of the images would be welcomed and appreciated. Thanks.

50% image size/high quality/2 frames

50% image size/medium quality/2 frames

50% image size/low quality/2 frames


25% image size /high quality/2 frames

25% image size/medium quality/2 frames

25% image size/low quality/2 frames


50% image size /high quality/4 frames

50% image size/medium quality/4 frames

50% image size/low quality/4 frames

I vote this one, not much difference between this and the low quality version. Low quality one should be fine

All of the low qual stuff still looks fine, so i'd go with those. I myself prefer the smaller pics. You can still see what's happening, but can fit more pictures on a screen so it's easier to compare stuff.

So you actually prefer to have all the images displayed on the same page? My plan was to normally have one or a couple of images at most to be displayed on a page. Would having a downloadable PDF of all the images be of interest?

Nothing is set in stone, so any comments or suggestions are appreciated. But I want to have a good idea of what would be the most useful/intuitive for others before I go formatting all the images for the web. Thanks again.

My preference is the 25%/low quality image setting.

Use a single image/frame for the majority of moves, and only a sequence (2 or 3 max) of images for the longer animating ones.

The VF5 White Book could be used as a reference. Refer to these sample scans:
Jacky (1)
Jacky (2)

Okay, reduced size, low quality, and 3 frames(images) max per each move.

Second thing, I would like some opinions on: some moves have longer/dramatic animation (compared to a straight jab or kick) that still images (at least to me) are unable to capture. Does having a drawn line/arrow help visualize the move in motion (top example, first image frame) or do you found it not necessary or even more of a distraction than without additional graphic (bottom example, first image frame)?

To me, the arrow looks more distracting than helpful.

Good! Less work on my part if it is more of a distraction.