All Round Escape (ARE)

Re: It's for real...

[ QUOTE ]
Cheers to Myke for posting this, and shame on those who knew about this technique but didn't care to share it.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes! <font color="green"> /me pounds a frothy beer mug on his table in agreement </font>

Thanks for getting the ball rolling. I was unhappy when I found out that a)the tech existed b) people knew and were content that only they would know

the Utility of the tech may seem to be minimal (or even useless) by some but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be addressed. it should be shared not squirreled away by people who think their doing others a favor by not sharing.

GE

 

Re: It's for real...

Yup. It sure is. I use it after a blocked SDE. /versus/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

 

Re: It's for real...

It only works for you because when I'm feeling sleepy I'm always one or two frames late in countering a blocked SDE... /versus/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

 

Re: It's for real...

No dude. I'm telling U. I'm gonna use it the next time we play. What an useful "bug"! /versus/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /versus/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

 

Re: It's for real...

LOL, did you know a blocked SDE is -6? Heh heh...just try it leh...

You guys going to play tomorrow?

 

Re: It's for real...

No one here is 100% sure that you cant do it at -6 rite?
Yup, i will be going down later.

 

Re: It's for real...

yeah myke, i got no problem with people disputing me as long as it's done in a polite manner.

Ice-9, if you go through the thread again, it is alucard who said I was mouthing off first. That was the reply to me explaining what ARE is when everyone had thought it consisted of a low punch, (which is not true).

[ QUOTE ]
Errr... how can anyone "do ECD while standing attack"? I never said I could or would do it anyway.

Why don't you read my post properly before you mouth off?


[/ QUOTE ]

 

Re: It's for real...

Alucard started the profanity, but you pre-empted it with the condescension (unjustified, in my view). *Shrug* It doesn't really concern me either way, so I should butt out.

Also, I did not come to the same conclusion you did, that "everyone had thought [ARE] consisted of a low punch."

 

Re: It's for real...

Well, yeah I generalized there a bit. I'm not one to hold grudges, and I'm glad alucard saw the difference and made it more clear on this issue. I just usually get frustrated when people don't see what I'm saying. You can easily tell if people get the point in their replies. Maybe I should work on coveying my idea better or whatnot. I just get defensive when I get attacked on things with unbased refutations. Oh well, I never mean to offend anyone, just don't be mad at me. I'm not at anyone.

/versus/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

 

Re: It's for real...

[ QUOTE ]
Srider said:

I'm not one to hold grudges, and I'm glad alucard saw the difference and made it more clear on this issue.

[/ QUOTE ]

Saw what difference? Several other posters had already made the point that ECD-->attack is an application of ARE.

I made the point they seemed to be similar(functionally) in my first post to Myke, you "mouthed-off" and told me that I didn't understand the concept, and that they are 2 different things without any basis/proof/testing/understanding to back up your claim. You can't blame me for err... not being polite.

I'm not going to waste my time explaining what is ARE to you, I suggest that you read the entire thread from the start and maybe, just maybe you will see that you are/were WRONG.

 

Re: It's for real...

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the info Myke. I think this technique is pretty similar to ECD --> FC move, only diff is that since you are essentially throwing out a low punch and not a 16 framish FC move, its safer and somewhat just as rewarding(due to the at the end).


[/ QUOTE ]

Oh well, I guess this is why those people who knew withheld the info.. I won't "mouth off" again.

/versus/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

 

Re: It's for real...

Whats wrong with that post? If the opponent delays his attack, a low punch will stand a greater chance of interupting his counter attack compared to a 16 framish FC attack.

Btw, GE, BMF, DRE. etc were the ones who actually contributed constructively to this thread(suggested the dodge input method), NOT you.

Oh well, I guess this is why those people who knew withheld the info.. I won't "mouth off" again.

Heh...the irony.