Explain why VF is better than SC?

OK i always read by some VF fans that their series is the most deep and balanced fighting game ever. Can someone explain me the reasons why they say it's the best?

You all could see the past 2 weeks the gaming community was hyped by the release of SC4 something that VF never achieved, never had the spotlight, never had the recognition. Why? In SC you can't button mash and there is competitive play so why some people still thinks that VF is THE fighting game? Please explain, i do not understand. Thank you.

 

*yawn*

 

Wow. . .better is relative

I still like Virtua Fighter better. Soul seems sloppy on game play, the graphics do not seem to be as GOOD as Virtua Fighter (at least to me).

As far as hardcore I think the term "balance" comes into mind. I mean really with all the shit they thrown in the box for Soul IV (yoda's, hiden characters, weird stuff, character creation) you can tell me with a straight face that the game is as balanced? I seriously doubt it. .

But they are both fun. I'll play Soul a little bit, but I will come back to VF.

 

Play both and see what you like. This website has plenty of info regarding VF's depth.

Given your name, and the fact that you registered today just to make this post (and a content-free PS3 vs 360 post), I'm going to assume you're trolling. Take it up with a mod over PM if you have a problem.